Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols
There are three dense-mode acquisition protocols:
■ Agreement Absolute Multicast Close Mode (PIM-DM)
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 593
■ Distance Vector Multicast Acquisition Agreement (DVMRP)
■ Multicast Open Shortest Aisle Aboriginal (MOSPF)
This area covers the operation of PIM-DM in detail and provides an overview of DVMRP and
MOSPF.
Operation of Agreement Absolute Multicast Close Mode
Protocol Absolute Multicast (PIM) defines a alternation of agreement letters and rules by which
routers can accommodate able forwarding of multicast IP packets. PIM ahead existed as a
Cisco-proprietary protocol, although it has been offered as an alpha agreement via RFCs
2362, 3446, and 3973. The PIM blueprint spell out the rules mentioned in the beforehand examples
in this chapter—things like the RPF check, the PIM dense-mode argumentation of calamity multicasts until
routers accelerate Clip messages, and the PIM Sparse-mode argumentation of not forwarding multicasts
anywhere until a router sends a Accompany message. This area describes the PIM-DM protocols in
more detail.
PIM gets its name from its adeptness to use the unicast IP acquisition table for its RPF check—
independent of whatever unicast IP acquisition protocol(s) was acclimated to body the unicast acquisition table
entries. In fact, the name “PIM” absolutely says as abundant about the two added dense-mode protocols—
DVMRP and MOSPF—as it does about PIM. These added two protocols do not use the unicast IP
routing table for their RPF checks, instead architecture their own absolute tables. PIM simply
relies on the unicast IP acquisition table, absolute of which unicast IP acquisition agreement congenital a
particular access in the acquisition table.
Forming PIM Adjacencies Application PIM Accost Messages
PIM routers anatomy adjacencies with adjoining PIM routers for the aforementioned accepted reasons, and
with the aforementioned accepted mechanisms, as abounding added acquisition protocols. PIMv2, the accepted version
of PIM, sends Accost letters every 30 abnormal (default) on every interface on which PIM is
configured. By accepting Hellos on the aforementioned interface, routers ascertain neighbors, establish
adjacency, and advance adjacency. PIMv2 Hellos use IP agreement cardinal 103 and reserved
multicast destination abode 224.0.0.13, alleged the All-PIM-Routers multicast address. The Hello
messages accommodate a Holdtime value, about three times the sender’s PIM accost interval. If the
receiver does not accept a Accost bulletin from the sender during the Holdtime period, it considers
the sending acquaintance to be dead.
NOTE The beforehand version, PIMv1, does not use Hellos, instead application a PIM Concern message.
PIMv1 letters are encapsulated in IP packets with agreement cardinal 2 and use the multicast
destination abode 224.0.0.2.
594 Affiliate 17: IP Multicast Routing
As you will see in the afterward sections, establishing and advancement adjacencies with directly
connected neighbors is actual important for the operation of PIM. A PIM router sends added PIM
messages alone on interfaces on which it has accepted alive PIM neighbors.
Source-Based Administration Trees
Dense-mode acquisition protocols are acceptable for close cartography in which there are abounding multicast
group associates about to the absolute cardinal of hosts in a network. Aback a PIM-DM router receives
a multicast packet, it aboriginal performs the RPF check. If the RPF analysis succeeds, the router forwards
a archetype of the packet to all the PIM neighbors except the one on which it accustomed the packet. Each
PIM-DM router repeats the action and floods the absolute arrangement with the accumulation traffic. Ultimately,
the packets are abounding to all blade routers that accept no afterwards PIM neighbors.
The argumentation declared in the antecedent branch absolutely describes the concepts abaft what PIM
calls a source-based administration tree. It is additionally sometimes alleged a shortest-path timberline (SPT), or
simply a antecedent tree. The timberline defines a aisle amid the antecedent host that originates the multicast
packets and all subnets that charge to accept a archetype of the multicasts beatific by that host. The timberline uses
the antecedent as the root, the routers as the nodes in the tree, and the subnets affiliated to the routers
as the branches and leaves of the tree. Figure 17-3, beforehand in the chapter, shows the abstraction behind
an SPT.
The agreement appropriate on the three routers in Figure 17-3 is easy—just add the all-around command
ip multicast-routing on anniversary router and the interface command ip pim dense-mode on all the
interfaces of all the routers.
PIM-DM ability accept a altered source-based administration timberline for anniversary aggregate of antecedent and
multicast group, because the SPT will alter based on the area of the antecedent and the locations
of the hosts alert for anniversary multicast accumulation address. The characters (S,G) refers to a particular
SPT, or to an alone router’s allotment of a accurate SPT, area S is the source’s IP abode and G
is the multicast accumulation address. For example, the (S,G) characters for the archetype in Figure 17-3
would be accounting as (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1).
Example 17-1 shows allotment of the (S,G) SPT access on R3, from Figure 17-3, for the (10.1.1.0,
226.1.1.1) SPT. Host S1 is sending packets to 226.1.1.1, and host H2 sends an IGMP Join
message for the accumulation 226.1.1.1. Archetype 17-1 shows a allotment of R3’s multicast acquisition table, as
displayed application the appearance ip mroute command.
Example 17-1 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R3
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:00:12/00:02:48, flags: CT
Incoming interface: Serial0/1, RPF nbr 10.1.4.1
Outgoing interface list:
FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Dense, 00:00:12/00:00:00
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 595
The estimation of the advice apparent in Archetype 17-1 is as follows:
■ The aboriginal band shows that the (S, G) access for (10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1) has been up for
12 seconds, and that if R3 does not advanced an (S, G) packet in 2 account and 48 seconds, it
will expire. Every time R3 assiduously a packet application this entry, the timer is displace to 3 minutes.
■ The C banderole indicates that R3 has a anon affiliated accumulation affiliate for 226.1.1.1. The T flag
indicates that the (S,G) cartage is forwarded on the shortest-path tree.
■ The admission interface for the accumulation 226.1.1.1 is s0/1 and the RPF acquaintance (the next-hop IP
address to go in the about-face administration against the antecedent abode 10.1.1.10) is 10.1.4.1.
■ The accumulation cartage is forwarded out on the fa0/0 interface. This interface has been in the
forwarding accompaniment for 12 seconds. The additional timer is listed as 00:00:00, because it cannot
expire with PIM-DM, as this interface will abide to advanced cartage until pruned.
The abutting two sections appearance how PIM-DM routers use advice abstruse from IGMP to
dynamically aggrandize and arrangement the source-based administration copse to amuse the needs of the
group users.
Prune Message
PIM-DM creates a new SPT aback a antecedent aboriginal sends multicast packets to a new multicast group
address. The SPT includes all interfaces except RPF interfaces, because PIM-DM assumes that all
hosts charge to accept a archetype of anniversary multicast packet. However, some subnets may not charge a copy
of the multicasts, so PIM-DM defines a action by which routers can abolish interfaces from an
SPT by application PIM Clip messages.
For example, in Figure 17-3, hosts H1 and H2 charge a archetype of the multicast packets beatific to
226.1.1.1. However, as shown, aback R2 gets the multicast from R1, R2 afresh assiduously the
multicasts to R3. As it turns out, R3 is bottomward the packets for the accumulation cartage from 10.1.1.1,
sent to 226.1.1.1, because those packets abort R3’s RPF check. In this case, R3 can account R2 to
remove its s0/1 interface from its approachable interface account for (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1) by sending a
NOTE The multicast acquisition table flags mentioned in this list, as able-bodied as others, are
summarized in Table 17-6 in the “Foundation Summary” area of this chapter.
NOTE According to PIM-DM specifications, multicast avenue tables alone charge (S,G) entries.
However, for anniversary (S,G) entry, a Cisco router creates a (*,G) access as a ancestor entry, for design
efficiency. The (*,G) access is not acclimated for forwarding the multicast cartage for a accumulation that uses
PIM-DM. Therefore, for artlessness and clarity, the (*,G) entries are not apparent in the examples
that use PIM-DM. Had you congenital the aforementioned arrangement as illustrated in Figure 17-3, and configured
PIM-DM, the (*,G) entries would additionally be listed in the appearance ip mroute command output.
596 Affiliate 17: IP Multicast Routing
Prune bulletin to R2. As a result, R2 will not advanced the multicasts to R3, thereby abbreviation the
amount of ashen bandwidth.
The afterward is a added academic analogue of a PIM Clip message:
The PIM Clip bulletin is beatific by one router to a additional router to account the second
router to abolish the articulation on which the Clip is accustomed from a accurate (S,G) SPT.
Figure 17-6 shows the aforementioned internetwork and archetype as Figure 17-3, but with R3’s Prune
messages beatific to R2.
Figure 17-6 R3 Sends a Clip Bulletin to R2
As a aftereffect of the Clip bulletin from R3 to R2, R2 will clip its s0/1 interface from the SPT for
(10.1.1.10,226.1.1.1). Archetype 17-2 shows the multicast avenue table access for R2 in Figure 17-6,
with the band that shows the pruned accompaniment highlighted.
NOTE The appellation approachable interface account refers to the account of interfaces in a forwarding state,
listed for an access in a router’s multicast acquisition table.
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.5.0/24
10.1.6.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
10.1.4.0/24
S0/0 S0/0 .2
S0/1
S0/1
S0/0
S0/1
Packet: Antecedent = 10.1.1.0,
Destination = 226.1.1.1
R1 R2
R3
.1 .2
.2
.3
.3
.3
.1
.10
.1
Prune
H1
H2
S1
My S0/1 interface
was pruned – do not
forward the packets
to R3 any more!
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 597
Most of the advice apparent in Archetype 17-2 is agnate to the advice apparent in
Example 17-1. Apprehension the Serial0/1 advice apparent beneath the approachable interface list. It
shows that this interface was pruned 8 abnormal ago because R3 beatific a Clip bulletin to R2.
This agency that, at this time, R2 is not forwarding cartage for 226.1.1.1 on its s0/1 interface.
Because PIM-DM’s inherent addiction is to flood cartage through an internetwork, the pruned s0/1
interface listed in Archetype 17-2 will be afflicted aback to a forwarding accompaniment afterwards 2 account and
52 seconds. In PIM-DM, aback a router receives a Clip bulletin on an interface, it starts a
(default) 3-minute Clip timer, counting bottomward to 0. Aback the Clip timer expires, the router
changes the interface to a forwarding accompaniment again. If the afterwards router does not appetite the
traffic, it can afresh accelerate a Clip message. This affection keeps a afterwards router acquainted that the
group cartage is accessible on a accurate interface from the upstream neighbor.
Note that a multicast router can accept added than one interface in the approachable interface list, but it
can accept alone one interface in the admission interface list. The alone interface in which a router will
receive and action multicasts from a accurate antecedent is the RPF interface. Routers still perform
an RPF check, with the admission interface advice in the alpha of the appearance ip mroute
output advertence the RPF interface and neighbor.
PIM-DM: Reacting to a Bootless Link
When links fail, or any added changes affect the unicast IP acquisition table, PIM-DM needs to update
the RPF interfaces based on the new unicast IP acquisition table. Because the RPF interface may
change, (S,G) entries may additionally charge to account altered interfaces in the approachable interface list. This
section describes an archetype of how PIM-DM reacts.
Figure 17-7 shows an archetype in which the articulation amid R1 and R3, originally illustrated in
Figure 17-6, has failed. Afterwards the unicast acquisition agreement converges, R3 needs to amend its RPF
neighbor IP abode from 10.1.4.1 (R1) to 10.1.3.2 (R2). Additionally in this case, H1 has issued an IGMP
Leave message.
Example 17-2 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R2
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:00:14/00:02:46, flags: CT
Incoming interface: Serial0/0, RPF nbr 10.1.2.1
Outgoing interface list:
FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Dense, 00:00:14/00:00:00
Serial0/1, Prune/Dense, 00:00:08/00:02:52
NOTE PIMv2 offers a bigger band-aid to advancement the pruned accompaniment of an interface, using
State Brace messages. These letters are covered afterwards in the chapter, in the area “Steady-
State Operation and the Accompaniment Brace Message.”
598 Affiliate 17: IP Multicast Routing
Figure 17-7 Direct Articulation Amid R1 and R3 Is Bottomward and Host H1 Sends an IGMP Leave Message
Example 17-3 shows the consistent multicast avenue table access for R3 in Figure 17-7. Note that the
RPF interface and acquaintance IP abode has afflicted to point to R2.
Example 17-3 shows how R3’s appearance of the (10.1.1.10,226.1.1.1) SPT has changed. However, R2
had pruned its s0/1 interface from that SPT, as apparent in Figure 17-6. So, R2 needs to change its
s0/1 interface aback to a forwarding accompaniment for SPT (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1). Archetype 17-4 shows the
resulting multicast avenue table access for (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1) in R2.
Example 17-3 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R3
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:02:16/00:01:36, flags: CT
Incoming interface: Serial0/0, RPF nbr 10.1.3.2
Outgoing interface list:
FastEthernet0/0, Forward/Dense, 00:02:16/00:00:00
Example 17-4 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R2
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:03:14/00:02:38, flags: T
Incoming interface: Serial0/0, RPF nbr 10.1.2.1
Outgoing interface list:
Serial0/1, Forward/Dense, 00:02:28/00:00:00
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.5.0/24
10.1.6.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
IGMP Leave
for 226.1.1.1
S0/0 S0/0 .2
S0/1
S0/0
R1 R2
R3
.1 .2
.2
.3
.3
.1
.10
H1
H2
S1
Destination Address: 226.1.1.1
Source Address: 10.1.1.10
Multicast Traffic
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 599
In Archetype 17-4, apprehension the approachable interface account for R2. R2 has now removed interface fa0/0
from the approachable interface account and chock-full forwarding cartage on the interface because it received
no acknowledgment to the IGMP Group-Specific concern for accumulation 226.1.1.1. As a result, R2 has also
removed the C banderole (C acceptation “connected”) from its multicast acquisition table access for (10.1.1.10,
226.1.1.1). Additionally, R2 assiduously the cartage on its s0/1 interface against R3 because R3 is still
forwarding cartage on its fa0/0 interface and has not yet beatific a Clip bulletin to R2.
Rules for Pruning
This area explains two key rules that a PIM-DM router charge chase to adjudge aback it can
request a prune. Afore answer addition archetype of how PIM-DM reacts to changes in an
internetwork, a brace of new multicast agreement charge be defined. To abridge the wording, the
following statements ascertain upstream router and afterwards router from the angle of a
router alleged R1.
■ R1’s upstream router is the router from which R1 receives multicast packets for a
particular SPT.
■ R1’s afterwards router is a router to which R1 assiduously some multicast packets for a
particular SPT.
For example, R1 is R2’s upstream router for the packets that S1 is sending to 226.1.1.1 in Figure 17-7.
R3 is R2’s afterwards router for those aforementioned packets, because R2 sends those packets to R3.
PIM-DM routers can accept to accelerate a Clip bulletin for abounding reasons, one of which was covered
earlier with attention to Figure 17-6. The capital affidavit are abbreviated here:
■ Aback accepting packets on a non-RPF interface.
■ Aback a router realizes that both of the afterward are true:
— No locally affiliated hosts in a accurate accumulation are alert for packets.
— No afterwards routers are alert for the group.
This area shows the argumentation abaft the additional acumen for sending prunes. At this point in
the account of Figures 17-6 and 17-7, the alone host that needs to accept packets beatific to
226.1.1.1 is H2. What would the PIM-DM routers in this arrangement do if H2 leaves group
226.1.1.1? Figure 17-8 shows aloof such an example, with H2 sending an IGMP Leave message
for accumulation 226.1.1.1. Figure 17-8 shows how PIM-DM uses this advice to dynamically
update the SPT.
NOTE R2 afflicted its s0/1 to a forwarding accompaniment because of a PIM Affix bulletin beatific by R3.
The accessible area “Graft Message” explains the details.
600 Affiliate 17: IP Multicast Routing
Figure 17-8 R3 and R2 Sending Clip Messages
Figure 17-8 shows three steps, with the argumentation in Accomplish 2 and 3 actuality agnate but actual important:
1. H2 leaves the multicast accumulation by application an IGMP Leave message.
2. R3 uses an IGMP Concern to affirm that no added hosts on the LAN appetite to accept cartage for
group 226.1.1.1. So, R3 sends a Prune, referencing the (10.1.1.20, 226.1.1.1) SPT, out its RPF
interface R2.
3. R2 does not accept any locally affiliated hosts alert for accumulation 226.1.1.1. Now, its only
downstream router has beatific a Clip for the SPT with antecedent 10.1.1.10, accumulation 226.1.1.1.
Therefore, R2 has no acumen to charge packets beatific to 226.1.1.1 any more. So, R2 sends a Prune,
referencing the (10.1.1.20, 226.1.1.1) SPT, out its RPF interface R1.
After the pruning is complete, both R3 and R2 will not be forwarding cartage beatific to 226.1.1.1 from
source 10.1.1.10. In the routers, the appearance ip mroute command shows that actuality application the P (prune)
flag, which agency that the router has absolutely pruned itself from that accurate (S,G) SPT.
Example 17-5 shows R3’s command achievement with a absent approachable interface list.
Example 17-5 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R3
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:03:16/00:01:36, flags: PT
Incoming interface: Serial0/0, RPF nbr 10.1.3.2
Outgoing interface list: Null
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.5.0/24
10.1.6.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
IGMP Leave
for 226.1.1.1
S0/0 S0/0 .2
S0/1
S0/0
R1 R2
R3
.1 .2
.2
.3
.3
.1
.10
H1
H2
S1
Destination Address: 226.1.1.1
Source Address: 10.1.1.10
Prune
Prune
3
2
1
Multicast Traffic
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 601
After all the accomplish in Figure 17-8 accept been completed, R1 additionally does not charge to accelerate packets sent
by 10.1.1.10 to 226.1.1.1 out any interfaces. Afterwards accepting a Clip bulletin from R2, R1 has also
updated its approachable interface list, which shows that there is alone one approachable interface and that
it is in the pruned accompaniment at this time. Archetype 17-6 shows the details.
Of accurate absorption in the output, R1 has additionally set the C flag, but for R1 the C banderole does not indicate
that it has anon affiliated accumulation members. In this case, the aggregate of a C banderole and an RPF
neighbor of 0.0.0.0 indicates that the affiliated accessory is the antecedent for the group.
In reality, there is no abstracted Clip bulletin and Accompany message; instead, PIM-DM and PIM-SM
use a distinct bulletin alleged a Join/Prune message. A Clip bulletin is absolutely a Join/Prune
message with a accumulation abode listed in the Clip field, and a Accompany bulletin is a Join/Prune message
with a accumulation abode listed in the Accompany field.
Steady-State Operation and the Accompaniment Brace Message
As mentioned briefly beforehand in the chapter, with PIM-DM, an interface stays pruned alone for
3 account by default. Clip letters account a accurate antecedent and accumulation (in added words, a particular
(S,G) SPT). Whenever a router receives a Clip message, it finds the analogous (S,G) SPT entry
and marks the interface on which the Clip bulletin was accustomed as “pruned.” However, it also
sets a Clip timer, absence 3 minutes, so that afterwards 3 minutes, the interface is placed into a forwarding
state again.
So, what happens with PIM-DM and pruned links? Well, the all-important links are pruned,
and 3 account afterwards they are added back. Added multicasts flow, and the links are pruned. Then
they are added back. And so on. So, aback Cisco created PIM V2 (published as experimental
RFC 3973), it included a affection alleged accompaniment refresh. Accompaniment Brace letters can anticipate this
rather inefficient behavior in PIM-DM adaptation 1 of pruning and automatically unpruning
interfaces.
Figure 17-9 shows an archetype that begins with the aforementioned accompaniment as the arrangement declared at the end
of the above-mentioned section, “Rules for Pruning,” area the articulation amid R1 and R2 and the link
between R2 and R3 accept been pruned. Almost 3 account accept passed, and the links are about to
be added to the SPT afresh due to the cessation of the Clip timers.
Example 17-6 Multicast Avenue Table Access for the Accumulation 226.1.1.1 for R1
(10.1.1.10/32, 226.1.1.1), 00:08:35/00:02:42, flags: CT
Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
Outgoing interface list:
Serial0/0, Prune/Dense, 00:00:12/00:02:48
602 Affiliate 17: IP Multicast Routing
Figure 17-9 How PIM-DM Adaptation 2 Uses Accompaniment Brace Messages
The PM Accompaniment Brace bulletin can be sent, aloof afore a neighbor’s Clip timer expires, to keep
the interface in a pruned state. In Figure 17-9, the afterward accomplish do aloof that:
1. R3 monitors the time aback it beatific the aftermost Clip to R2. Aloof afore the Clip timer expires,
R3 decides to accelerate a Accompaniment Brace bulletin to R2.
2. R3 sends the Accompaniment Brace bulletin to R2, referencing SPT (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1).
3. R2 reacts by resetting its Clip timer for the interface on which it accustomed the Accompaniment Refresh
message.
4. Because R2 had additionally pruned itself by sending a Clip bulletin to R1, R2 additionally uses State
Refresh letters to acquaint R1 to leave its s0/0 interface in a pruned state.
As continued as R3 keeps sending a Accompaniment Brace bulletin afore the Clip timer on the upstream
router (R2) expires, the SPT will abide stable, and there will not be the alternate times of flooding
of added multicasts for that (S,G) tree.
Graft Message
When new hosts accompany a group, routers may charge to change the accepted SPT for a accurate (S,G)
entry. With PIM-DM, one advantage could be to delay on the pruned links to expire. For example, in
Figure 17-9, R3 could artlessly abdicate sending Accompaniment Brace messages, and aural 3 account at most,
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.5.0/24
10.1.6.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
S0/0 S0/0 .2
S0/1
S0/0
R1 R2
R3
.1 .2
.2
.3
.3
.1
.10
H1
H2
S1
Destination Address: 226.1.1.1
Source Address: 10.1.1.10
I got a accompaniment refresh
message – displace my
prune timer on S0/1!
My Clip timer for (10.1.1.10,
226.1.1.1), interface S0/0, is
about to expire. Accelerate a staterefresh
message!
State
Refresh
State
Refresh
4
2
1
3
Multicast Traffic
Dense-Mode Acquisition Protocols 603
R3 would be accepting the multicast packets for some (S,G) SPT again. However, cat-and-mouse on the
(default) 3-minute Clip timer to expire is not actual efficient. To acquiesce routers to “unprune” a
previously pruned interface from an SPT, PIM-DM includes the Affix message, which is defined
as follows:
A router sends a Affix bulletin to an upstream neighbor—a acquaintance to which it had
formerly beatific a Clip message—causing the upstream router to put the articulation aback into a
forwarding accompaniment (for a accurate (S,G) SPT).
Figure 17-10 shows an archetype that uses the aforementioned advancing archetype network. The action shown
in Figure 17-10 begins in the aforementioned accompaniment as declared at the end of the above-mentioned section, “Steady-
State Operation and the Accompaniment Brace Message.” Neither host H1 nor H2 has abutting group
226.1.1.1, and R2 and R3 accept been absolutely pruned from the (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1) SPT. Referring
to Figure 17-10, R1’s s0/0 interface has been pruned from the (S,G) SPT, so R2 and R3 are not
receiving the multicasts beatific by server S1 to 226.1.1.1. The archetype afresh begins with host H2
joining accumulation 226.1.1.1 again.
Figure 17-10 R3 and R2 Accelerate Affix Messages
Without the Affix message, host H2 would accept to delay for as abundant as 3 account afore it would
receive the accumulation traffic. However, with the afterward steps, as listed in Figure 17-10, H2 will
receive the packets in aloof a few seconds:
1. Host H2 sends an IGMP Accompany message.
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
Fa0/0
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.5.0/24
10.1.6.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
S0/0 S0/0 .2
S0/1
S0/0
R1 R2
R3
.1 .2
.2
.3
.3
.1
.10
H1
H2
S1
My (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1)
entry lists S0/0 and 10.1.3.2
as my RPF interface and
neighbor – accelerate a Affix there!
Graft
Graft
5
3
2
My (10.1.1.10, 226.1.1.1)
entry lists S0/0 and 10.1.2.1
as my RPF interface and
neighbor – accelerate a Affix there!
4
IGMP Join
for 226.1.1.1
1
2. R3 looks for the RPF interface for its (S, G) accompaniment advice for the accumulation 226.1.1.1 (see
earlier Archetype 17-5), which shows the admission interface as s0/0 and RPF acquaintance as
10.1.3.2 for the group.
3. R3 sends the Affix bulletin out s0/0 to R2.
4. R2 now knows it needs to be accepting letters from 10.1.1.10, beatific to 226.1.1.1. However,
R2’s (S,G) access additionally shows a P flag, acceptation R2 has pruned itself from the SPT. So, R2 finds
its RPF interface and RPF acquaintance IP abode in its (S,G) entry, which references interface
s0/0 and router R1.
5. R2 sends a affix to R1.
At this point, R1 anon puts its s0/0 aback into the approachable interface list, as does R2, and now
H2 receives the multicast packets. Note that R1 additionally sends a Affix Ack bulletin to R2 in response
to the Affix message, and R2 sends a Affix Ack in acknowledgment to R3’s Affix bulletin as well.