Design Guidelines for Multisite WAN with Centralized Call-Processing


Design Guidelines for Multisite WAN with Centralized Call-Processing

Deployment

Follow these guidelines back implementing the multisite WAN archetypal with centralized

call processing:

■ Minimize adjournment amid Cisco UCM and alien locations to abate articulation cutthrough

delays (also accepted as clipping). The ITU-T G.114 advocacy specifies

a 150 ms best one way.

■ Use HSRP for arrangement resiliency.

■ Use the locations apparatus in Cisco UCM to accommodate alarm acceptance ascendancy into

and out of alien branches.

■ The cardinal of IP phones and band appearances accurate in SRST access at each

remote armpit depends on the annex router platform, the bulk of anamnesis installed,

and the Cisco IOS release. SRST on a Cisco IOS aperture supports up to 720 phones,

whereas Unified CME active in SRST access supports 240 phones. Generally speaking,

however, the best of whether to accept a centralized alarm processing or distributed

call processing access for a accustomed armpit depends on a cardinal of factors,

such as

■ IP WAN bandwidth or adjournment limitations

■ Criticality of the articulation network

■ Feature set needs

■ Scalability

■ Ease of management

■ Cost

42 Authorized Self-Study Guide: Cisco Articulation over IP (CVOICE)

Note If a broadcast call-processing archetypal is accounted added acceptable for a customer’s

business needs, the choices accommodate installing a UCM array at anniversary armpit or active Unified

CME at the alien sites.

■ At the alien sites, use the afterward appearance to ensure alarm processing survivability

in the accident of a WAN failure:

■ For SCCP phones, use SRST on a Cisco IOS aperture or Unified CME active in

SRST mode.

■ For SIP phones, use SIP SRST.

■ For MGCP phones, use MGCP Aperture Fallback.

SRST or Unified CME in SRST mode, SIP SRST, and MGCP Aperture Fallback can reside

with anniversary added on the aforementioned Cisco IOS gateway.

For specific allocation recommendations, accredit to the Cisco Unified Communications SRND

based on Cisco UCM 6.x at the afterward link:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_implementation_

design_guide_book09186a008085eb0d.html

Multisite WAN with Broadcast Call-Processing Deployment

The archetypal for a multisite WAN deployment with broadcast alarm processing, as illustrated

in Figure 1-27, consists of assorted absolute sites, anniversary with its own call-processing

agent array affiliated to an IP WAN that carries articulation cartage amid the distributed

sites.

An IP WAN interconnects all the broadcast alarm processing sites. Typically, the PSTN

serves as a advancement affiliation amid the sites in case the IP WAN affiliation fails or

does not accept anymore accessible bandwidth. A armpit affiliated alone through the PSTN is a

standalone armpit and is not covered by the broadcast alarm processing model.

WAN connectivity options accommodate the following:

■ Leased lines

■ Frame Relay

■ ATM

■ ATM and Frame Relay SIW

■ MPLS VPN

■ IPsec V3PN

Multisite broadcast alarm processing allows anniversary armpit to be absolutely self-contained. In

the accident of an IP WAN abortion or bereft bandwidth, a armpit does not lose callprocessing

service or functionality. Cisco UCM artlessly sends all calls amid the sites

across the PSTN.

Chapter 1: Introducing Articulation over IP Networks 43

Multisite WAN with Broadcast Alarm Processing

Design Characteristics of Multisite WAN with Broadcast Call-Processing

Deployment

The multisite archetypal with broadcast alarm processing has the afterward design

characteristics:

■ Best of 30,000 SCCP or SIP IP phones or SCCP video endpoints per cluster.

■ Best of 1100 MGCP gateways or H.323 accessories (gateways, MCUs, trunks, and

clients) per UCM cluster.

■ PSTN for all alien calls.

■ DSP assets for conferencing, transcoding, and MTP.

■ Articulation mail, unified messaging, and Cisco Unified Presence components.

■ Capability to accommodate with bequest PBX and voice-mail systems.

■ H.323 clients, MCUs, and H.323/H.320 gateways that crave a attendant to place

calls charge annals with a Cisco IOS Attendant (Cisco IOS Absolution 12.3(8)T or later).

UCM again uses an H.323 block to accommodate with the attendant and accommodate call

routing and bandwidth administration casework for the H.323 accessories registered to it.

Multiple Cisco IOS Gatekeepers ability be acclimated to accommodate redundancy. Cisco IOS

Gatekeepers ability additionally be acclimated to accommodate alarm acquisition and bandwidth management

between the broadcast UCM clusters. In best situations, Cisco recommends that

each UCM array accept its own set of endpoint gatekeepers and that a abstracted set

of gatekeepers be acclimated to administer intercluster calls. It is accessible in some circumstances

to use the aforementioned set of gatekeepers for both functions, depending on the size

of the arrangement and complication of the punch plan.

■ MCU assets are appropriate in anniversary array for multipoint video conferencing.

Depending on conferencing requirements, these assets ability be either SCCP or

H.323, or both, and ability all be amid at the bounded sites or broadcast to the

remote sites of anniversary array if bounded conferencing assets are required.

■ H.323/H.320 video gateways are bare to acquaint with H.320 videoconferencing

devices on the accessible ISDN network. These gateways ability all be amid at

the bounded sites or broadcast to the alien sites of anniversary array if bounded ISDN

access is required.

■ High-bandwidth audio (for example, G.711, G.722, or Cisco Wideband Audio)

between accessories in the aforementioned site, but low-bandwidth audio (for example, G.729 or

G.728) amid accessories in altered sites.

■ High-bandwidth video (for example, 384 kbps or greater) amid accessories in the

same site, but low-bandwidth video (for example, 128 kbps) amid accessories at different

sites. The Cisco Unified Video Advantage Wideband Codec, operating at

7 Mbps, is recommended alone for calls amid accessories at the aforementioned site. Note that

the Cisco VT Camera Wideband Video Codec is not accurate over intercluster

trunks.

■ Minimum of 768 kbps or greater WAN articulation speeds. Video is not recommended on

WAN access that accomplish at speeds lower than 768 kbps.

■ Alarm acceptance ascendancy is provided by UCM locations for calls amid sites controlled

by the aforementioned UCM array and by the Cisco IOS Attendant for calls between

UCM clusters (that is, intercluster trunks). AAR is additionally accurate for both intracluster

and intercluster video calls.